DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BuJG
Docket No: 6629-13
16 July 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant ta the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 July 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Naval Discharge Review Board, dated 28 October
2004, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 28 January 1989. On 1
October, you were authorized to be in a non-drill status for six
months to complete school. on 16 April 1992, you were nominated
for an involuntary period of annual training due to
unsatisfactory drill participation after accruing six unexcused
absences. You were then advised that your command was
processing you for administrative separation with an other than
honorable (OTH) characterization of service due to
unsatisfactory participation. You waived your procedural right
to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board
(ADB). On 6 February 1993, you received the OTH
characterization of service due to unsatisfactory participation,
and were not recommended for reenlistment.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully
considered all potentially mitigating factors, such as your
youth, counsel’s allegation that you were misled into believing
that you would receive a general characterization of service,
post service good conduct, and current desire to upgrade your
#aiecharge. The, Board concluded, however, that your discharge
shou. Gi NGe be- changed due to your unsatisfactory participation.
="Board waS unable to find any evidence in your record to
support your allegation. The Board noted that you waived your
right to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a better
characterization of service. In view of the above, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
“of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
© Ste | Raa
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
Copy to:
By Esq.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7114 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11146-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6086 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08558-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. “Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06223-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. On 15 February 1994, you were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to unsatisfactory participation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4694 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. you did not respond to the notification and as such waived your ocedural rights your right to an administrative discharge board ( 1992, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08274-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You forfeited all of your procedural rights, including your right to an administrative discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5714 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were released from ADT on 15 May 1974, You began a period of Marine Corps Reserve Participation on 16 May 1974.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05897-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 March 2012. On 10 August 2006, you were notified of pending administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to unsatisfactory participation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02577-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2013. On 22 September 1993, you were notified of pending, administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to unsatisfactory participation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.